Australia vs South Africa: Wild fish allocation
Australia
32,847
in 2015
South Africa
28,842
in 2015
Australia rank
9th
South Africa rank
11th
Wild fish allocation over time
- Australia
- South Africa
How they compare
Australia currently reports 32,847 against 28,842 in South Africa, a difference of 4,005.
That makes Australia's figure about 1.1 times South Africa's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 66 shared years of data; in 1950 it was South Africa ahead.
Australia ranks 9th and South Africa ranks 11th of 138 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | South Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 27.14 | 151.97 | 124.83 | South Africa |
| 1960s | 39.1 | 168.8 | 129.7 | South Africa |
| 1970s | 58.54 | 370.63 | 312.09 | South Africa |
| 1980s | 87.38 | 430.24 | 342.87 | South Africa |
| 1990s | 1,711 | 2,622 | 910.71 | South Africa |
| 2000s | 21,159 | 58,642 | 37,482 | South Africa |
| 2010s | 30,921 | 30,728 | 193.08 | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wild fish allocation, Australia or South Africa?
- Australia, at 32,847 against 28,842 in South Africa as of 2015.
- What is the difference in wild fish allocation between Australia and South Africa?
- 4,005, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and South Africa?
- 66 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2015.
- How do Australia and South Africa rank globally for wild fish allocation?
- Australia ranks 9th and South Africa ranks 11th of 138 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Wild fish allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.