Aruba vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Wild fish allocation
Aruba
0.066
in 2015
Turks and Caicos Islands
0.0668
in 2015
Aruba rank
128th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
127th
Wild fish allocation over time
- Aruba
- Turks and Caicos Islands
How they compare
Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 0.0668 against 0.066 in Aruba, a difference of 0.0008.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 51 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Aruba ahead.
Aruba ranks 128th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 127th of 138 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 5 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Turks and Caicos Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0826 | 0.0019 | 0.0808 | Aruba |
| 1970s | 0.1337 | 0.0048 | 0.1289 | Aruba |
| 1980s | 0.1156 | 0.0122 | 0.1034 | Aruba |
| 1990s | 0.0783 | 0.023 | 0.0554 | Aruba |
| 2000s | 0.0583 | 0.0385 | 0.0198 | Aruba |
| 2010s | 0.0547 | 0.0593 | 0.0047 | Turks and Caicos Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wild fish allocation, Aruba or Turks and Caicos Islands?
- Turks and Caicos Islands, at 0.0668 against 0.066 in Aruba as of 2015.
- What is the difference in wild fish allocation between Aruba and Turks and Caicos Islands?
- 0.0008, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Turks and Caicos Islands?
- 51 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2015.
- How do Aruba and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for wild fish allocation?
- Aruba ranks 128th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 127th of 138 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Wild fish allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.