Aruba vs British Virgin Islands: Wild fish allocation
Aruba
0.066
in 2015
British Virgin Islands
0.068
in 2015
Aruba rank
128th
British Virgin Islands rank
126th
Wild fish allocation over time
- Aruba
- British Virgin Islands
How they compare
British Virgin Islands currently reports 0.068 against 0.066 in Aruba, a difference of 0.002.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 66 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Aruba ahead.
Aruba ranks 128th and British Virgin Islands ranks 126th of 140 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 5 and British Virgin Islands in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | British Virgin Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 0.0208 | 0.0149 | 0.0059 | Aruba |
| 1960s | 0.0523 | 0.0209 | 0.0314 | Aruba |
| 1970s | 0.1337 | 0.0235 | 0.1103 | Aruba |
| 1980s | 0.1156 | 0.0337 | 0.0819 | Aruba |
| 1990s | 0.0783 | 0.0446 | 0.0337 | Aruba |
| 2000s | 0.0583 | 0.0634 | 0.0052 | British Virgin Islands |
| 2010s | 0.0547 | 0.0694 | 0.0147 | British Virgin Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wild fish allocation, Aruba or British Virgin Islands?
- British Virgin Islands, at 0.068 against 0.066 in Aruba as of 2015.
- What is the difference in wild fish allocation between Aruba and British Virgin Islands?
- 0.002, with British Virgin Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and British Virgin Islands?
- 66 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2015.
- How do Aruba and British Virgin Islands rank globally for wild fish allocation?
- Aruba ranks 128th and British Virgin Islands ranks 126th of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Our World in Data, published as Wild fish allocation. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.