Aruba vs Barbados: What is wild fish catch used for?
Aruba
0.066 tonnes
in 2015
Barbados
0.0594 tonnes
in 2015
Aruba rank
128th
Barbados rank
129th
What is wild fish catch used for? over time
- Aruba
- Barbados
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 0.066 tonnes against 0.0594 tonnes in Barbados, a difference of 0.0066 tonnes.
That makes Aruba's figure about 1.1 times Barbados's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 22 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Aruba ahead.
Aruba ranks 128th and Barbados ranks 129th of 140 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Aruba averaged higher in 1 and Barbados in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Barbados | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.0809 tonnes | 0.0533 tonnes | 0.0276 tonnes | Aruba |
| 2000s | 0.0583 tonnes | 0.0754 tonnes | 0.0171 tonnes | Barbados |
| 2010s | 0.0547 tonnes | 0.066 tonnes | 0.0113 tonnes | Barbados |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher what is wild fish catch used for?, Aruba or Barbados?
- Aruba, at 0.066 tonnes against 0.0594 tonnes in Barbados as of 2015.
- What is the difference in what is wild fish catch used for? between Aruba and Barbados?
- 0.0066 tonnes, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Barbados?
- 22 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2015.
- How do Aruba and Barbados rank globally for what is wild fish catch used for??
- Aruba ranks 128th and Barbados ranks 129th of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Sea Around Us (2020) β processed by Our World in Data, published as What is wild fish catch used for?. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.