Angola vs Sweden: What is wild fish catch used for?
Angola
2,220 tonnes
in 2015
Sweden
2,082 tonnes
in 2015
Angola rank
27th
Sweden rank
28th
What is wild fish catch used for? over time
- Angola
- Sweden
How they compare
Angola currently reports 2,220 tonnes against 2,082 tonnes in Sweden, a difference of 138 tonnes.
That makes Angola's figure about 1.1 times Sweden's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 66 shared years of data; in 1950 it was Angola ahead.
Angola ranks 27th and Sweden ranks 28th of 140 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1950s | 1,457 tonnes | 291.13 tonnes | 1,166 tonnes | Angola |
| 1960s | 2,184 tonnes | 2,817 tonnes | 633.66 tonnes | Sweden |
| 1970s | 1,908 tonnes | 2,645 tonnes | 737.31 tonnes | Sweden |
| 1980s | 376.68 tonnes | 3,030 tonnes | 2,653 tonnes | Sweden |
| 1990s | 568.47 tonnes | 4,053 tonnes | 3,484 tonnes | Sweden |
| 2000s | 967.06 tonnes | 2,754 tonnes | 1,787 tonnes | Sweden |
| 2010s | 1,462 tonnes | 1,900 tonnes | 437.82 tonnes | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher what is wild fish catch used for?, Angola or Sweden?
- Angola, at 2,220 tonnes against 2,082 tonnes in Sweden as of 2015.
- What is the difference in what is wild fish catch used for? between Angola and Sweden?
- 138 tonnes, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Sweden?
- 66 years are reported by both, from 1950 to 2015.
- How do Angola and Sweden rank globally for what is wild fish catch used for??
- Angola ranks 27th and Sweden ranks 28th of 140 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Sea Around Us (2020) – processed by Our World in Data, published as What is wild fish catch used for?. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.