Chile vs Zimbabwe: Wheat: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) … square

Chile
0.4112 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.2853 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
62nd
Zimbabwe rank
65th

Wheat: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) … square over time

  • Chile
  • Zimbabwe
00.20.40.6196119922023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 0.4112 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.2853 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.1259 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.4 times Zimbabwe's.

Across all 61 years both countries report, Chile has been ahead every year.

Chile ranks 62nd and Zimbabwe ranks 65th of 110 countries.

Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.3679 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0068 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3611 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
1970s 0.3355 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0733 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2622 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
1980s 0.3835 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1225 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.261 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
1990s 0.4658 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1407 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3251 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
2000s 0.5241 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1234 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4008 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
2010s 0.4649 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0276 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4373 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
2020s 0.397 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1937 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2033 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher wheat — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per, Chile or Zimbabwe?
Chile, at 0.4112 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.2853 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Zimbabwe as of 2023.
What is the difference in wheat — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per between Chile and Zimbabwe?
0.1259 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Zimbabwe?
61 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Zimbabwe rank globally for wheat — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per?
Chile ranks 62nd and Zimbabwe ranks 65th of 110 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Wheat — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Zimbabwe: Wheat — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/wheat-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/chile/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/wheat-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/chile/zimbabwe/">Chile vs Zimbabwe: Wheat — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Wheat — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
111 places, 5,682 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Wheat — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.