Brazil vs Zimbabwe: Wheat: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) … square

Brazil
0.219 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
0.2853 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil rank
67th
Zimbabwe rank
65th

Wheat: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) … square over time

  • Brazil
  • Zimbabwe
00.10.20.3196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 0.2853 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.219 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Brazil, a difference of 0.0663 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.3 times Brazil's.

The two have swapped places 15 times across 61 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Brazil ahead.

Brazil ranks 67th and Zimbabwe ranks 65th of 110 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 3 and Zimbabwe in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0068 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0132 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Brazil
1970s 0.0635 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0733 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0097 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1980s 0.1086 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1225 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0139 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 0.0713 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1407 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0694 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 0.1113 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1234 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.012 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 0.1588 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0276 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1311 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Brazil
2020s 0.2288 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1937 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0351 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher wheat — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per, Brazil or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 0.2853 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.219 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Brazil as of 2023.
What is the difference in wheat — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per between Brazil and Zimbabwe?
0.0663 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Zimbabwe?
61 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Zimbabwe rank globally for wheat — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per?
Brazil ranks 67th and Zimbabwe ranks 65th of 110 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Wheat — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Zimbabwe: Wheat — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/wheat-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/brazil/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/wheat-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/brazil/zimbabwe/">Brazil vs Zimbabwe: Wheat — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Wheat — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
111 places, 5,682 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Wheat — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.