Bhutan vs Oman: Wheat: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) … square

Bhutan
0.0052 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Oman
0.006 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bhutan rank
91st
Oman rank
90th

Wheat: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) … square over time

  • Bhutan
  • Oman
00.0250.050.0750.10.125196119922023

How they compare

Oman currently reports 0.006 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0052 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Bhutan, a difference of 0.0008 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Oman's figure about 1.2 times Bhutan's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Bhutan ahead.

Bhutan ranks 91st and Oman ranks 90th of 110 countries.

Bhutan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Oman Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0279 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0012 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0267 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bhutan
1970s 0.037 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0014 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0356 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bhutan
1980s 0.0451 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0005 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0446 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bhutan
1990s 0.0707 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0009 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0697 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bhutan
2000s 0.038 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0009 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0371 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bhutan
2010s 0.0246 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0022 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0224 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bhutan
2020s 0.0068 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0034 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0034 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bhutan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher wheat — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per, Bhutan or Oman?
Oman, at 0.006 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0052 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Bhutan as of 2023.
What is the difference in wheat — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per between Bhutan and Oman?
0.0008 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Oman ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Oman?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bhutan and Oman rank globally for wheat — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per?
Bhutan ranks 91st and Oman ranks 90th of 110 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Wheat — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Oman: Wheat — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/wheat-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/oman/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/wheat-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/oman/">Bhutan vs Oman: Wheat — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Wheat — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
111 places, 5,682 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Wheat — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.