Bhutan vs Namibia: Wheat: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) … square

Bhutan
0.0052 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
0.0071 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bhutan rank
91st
Namibia rank
89th

Wheat: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) … square over time

  • Bhutan
  • Namibia
00.0250.050.0750.10.125196119922023

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0.0071 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0052 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Bhutan, a difference of 0.0019 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.4 times Bhutan's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Bhutan ahead.

Bhutan ranks 91st and Namibia ranks 89th of 110 countries.

Bhutan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Namibia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0279 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0002 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0278 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bhutan
1970s 0.037 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0002 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0368 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bhutan
1980s 0.0451 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.001 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0441 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bhutan
1990s 0.0707 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0015 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0692 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bhutan
2000s 0.038 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0029 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0351 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bhutan
2010s 0.0246 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0031 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0215 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bhutan
2020s 0.0068 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0048 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0021 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bhutan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher wheat — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per, Bhutan or Namibia?
Namibia, at 0.0071 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0052 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Bhutan as of 2023.
What is the difference in wheat — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per between Bhutan and Namibia?
0.0019 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Namibia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bhutan and Namibia rank globally for wheat — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per?
Bhutan ranks 91st and Namibia ranks 89th of 110 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Wheat — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Namibia: Wheat — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/wheat-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/wheat-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/bhutan/namibia/">Bhutan vs Namibia: Wheat — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Wheat — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
111 places, 5,682 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Wheat — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.