Angola vs Ecuador: Wheat: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) … square

Angola
0.004 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador
0.0038 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Angola rank
93rd
Ecuador rank
94th

Wheat: Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand) … square over time

  • Angola
  • Ecuador
00.020.040.060.08196119922023

How they compare

Angola currently reports 0.004 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0038 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 0.0002 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.

Angola ranks 93rd and Ecuador ranks 94th of 110 countries.

Ecuador has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Ecuador Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0039 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0594 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0555 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1970s 0.0023 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0453 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.043 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1980s 0.0007 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0262 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0255 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
1990s 0.0008 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0187 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.018 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 0.0008 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0097 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0089 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 0.0009 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0056 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0047 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 0.002 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0088 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0068 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Ecuador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher wheat — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per, Angola or Ecuador?
Angola, at 0.004 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0038 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in wheat — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per between Angola and Ecuador?
0.0002 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Angola ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Ecuador?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Angola and Ecuador rank globally for wheat — gross production value (constant 2014-2016 thousand i$), per?
Angola ranks 93rd and Ecuador ranks 94th of 110 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Wheat — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Ecuador: Wheat — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/wheat-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/angola/ecuador/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/wheat-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square-kilometre/angola/ecuador/">Angola vs Ecuador: Wheat — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Wheat — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
111 places, 5,682 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Wheat — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.