Latvia vs Tunisia: Wheat — Area harvested, per unit of GDP
Latvia
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Tunisia
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Latvia rank
12th
Tunisia rank
15th
Wheat — Area harvested, per unit of GDP over time
- Latvia
- Tunisia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Tunisia, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.2 times Tunisia's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Tunisia ahead.
Latvia ranks 12th and Tunisia ranks 15th of 110 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Tunisia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Tunisia |
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Tunisia |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Tunisia |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wheat — area harvested, per unit of gdp, Latvia or Tunisia?
- Latvia, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Tunisia as of 2024.
- What is the difference in wheat — area harvested, per unit of gdp between Latvia and Tunisia?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Tunisia?
- 30 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2024.
- How do Latvia and Tunisia rank globally for wheat — area harvested, per unit of gdp?
- Latvia ranks 12th and Tunisia ranks 15th of 110 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Wheat — Area harvested, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Wheat — Area harvested divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.