Which has higher wheat — area harvested, per unit of gdp, Guatemala or New Caledonia?

New Caledonia, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Guatemala as of 2024.

What is the difference in wheat — area harvested, per unit of gdp between Guatemala and New Caledonia?

0 ha per US$ of GDP, with New Caledonia ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and New Caledonia?

60 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Wheat — Area harvested, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Guatemala vs New Caledonia: Wheat — Area harvested, per unit of GDP

Guatemala

0 ha per US$ of GDP

in 2024

New Caledonia

0 ha per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Guatemala rank

106th

New Caledonia rank

103rd

Wheat — Area harvested, per unit of GDP over time

Guatemala
New Caledonia

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Guatemala, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.

That makes New Caledonia's figure about 2.1 times Guatemala's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 60 shared years of data; in 1965 it was Guatemala ahead.

Guatemala ranks 106th and New Caledonia ranks 103rd of 110 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guatemala averaged higher in 6 and New Caledonia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Guatemala	New Caledonia	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0 ha per US$ of GDP	0 ha per US$ of GDP	0 ha per US$ of GDP	Guatemala
1970s	0 ha per US$ of GDP	0 ha per US$ of GDP	0 ha per US$ of GDP	Guatemala
1980s	0 ha per US$ of GDP	0 ha per US$ of GDP	0 ha per US$ of GDP	Guatemala
1990s	0 ha per US$ of GDP	0 ha per US$ of GDP	0 ha per US$ of GDP	Guatemala
2000s	0 ha per US$ of GDP	0 ha per US$ of GDP	0 ha per US$ of GDP	Guatemala
2010s	0 ha per US$ of GDP	0 ha per US$ of GDP	0 ha per US$ of GDP	Guatemala
2020s	0 ha per US$ of GDP	0 ha per US$ of GDP	0 ha per US$ of GDP	New Caledonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher wheat — area harvested, per unit of gdp, Guatemala or New Caledonia?: New Caledonia, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Guatemala as of 2024.
What is the difference in wheat — area harvested, per unit of gdp between Guatemala and New Caledonia?: 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guatemala and New Caledonia?: 60 years are reported by both, from 1965 to 2024.
How do Guatemala and New Caledonia rank globally for wheat — area harvested, per unit of gdp?: Guatemala ranks 106th and New Caledonia ranks 103rd of 110 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Wheat — Area harvested, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guatemala vs New Caledonia: Wheat — Area harvested, per unit of GDP. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/wheat-area-harvested-per-unit-of-gdp/guatemala/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/wheat-area-harvested-per-unit-of-gdp/guatemala/new-caledonia/">Guatemala vs New Caledonia: Wheat — Area harvested, per unit of GDP</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Wheat — Area harvested, per unit of GDP
Unit: ha per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 111 places, 5,787 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 06 October 2026

Wheat — Area harvested divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.