Angola vs Luxembourg: Wheat — Area harvested, per unit of GDP
Angola
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Luxembourg
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Angola rank
79th
Luxembourg rank
82nd
Wheat — Area harvested, per unit of GDP over time
- Angola
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Angola currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Luxembourg, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
That makes Angola's figure about 1.5 times Luxembourg's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 25 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Luxembourg ahead.
Angola ranks 79th and Luxembourg ranks 82nd of 110 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 1 and Luxembourg in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Luxembourg |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Luxembourg |
| 2020s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Angola |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher wheat — area harvested, per unit of gdp, Angola or Luxembourg?
- Angola, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Luxembourg as of 2024.
- What is the difference in wheat — area harvested, per unit of gdp between Angola and Luxembourg?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Luxembourg?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2024.
- How do Angola and Luxembourg rank globally for wheat — area harvested, per unit of gdp?
- Angola ranks 79th and Luxembourg ranks 82nd of 110 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Wheat — Area harvested, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Wheat — Area harvested divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.