How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Malawi?

40 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Burundi vs Malawi: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Burundi

0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Malawi

0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Burundi rank

5th

Malawi rank

3rd

Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Burundi
Malawi

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Burundi, a difference of 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.

That makes Malawi's figure about 1.1 times Burundi's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 40 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Burundi ahead.

Burundi ranks 5th and Malawi ranks 3rd of 135 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Burundi averaged higher in 4 and Malawi in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Burundi	Malawi	Difference	Ahead
1980s	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Burundi
1990s	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Burundi
2000s	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Burundi
2010s	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Burundi
2020s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Burundi or Malawi?: Malawi, at 0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Burundi as of 2024.
What is the difference in vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Burundi and Malawi?: 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Malawi?: 40 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2024.
How do Burundi and Malawi rank globally for vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Burundi ranks 5th and Malawi ranks 3rd of 135 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Burundi vs Malawi: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of-gdp/burundi/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of-gdp/burundi/malawi/">Burundi vs Malawi: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 136 places, 7,264 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 23 September 2026

Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.