How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Chile?

55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Bhutan vs Chile: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Bhutan

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Chile

0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP

in 2024

Bhutan rank

52nd

Chile rank

55th

Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Bhutan
Chile

How they compare

Bhutan currently reports 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Chile, a difference of 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP.

That makes Bhutan's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Bhutan ahead.

Bhutan ranks 52nd and Chile ranks 55th of 135 countries.

Bhutan has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Bhutan	Chile	Difference	Ahead
1970s	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0.0001 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Bhutan
1980s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Bhutan
1990s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Bhutan
2000s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Bhutan
2010s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Bhutan
2020s	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP	Bhutan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Bhutan or Chile?: Bhutan, at 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP against 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP in Chile as of 2024.
What is the difference in vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Bhutan and Chile?: 0 1000 USD per US$ of GDP, with Bhutan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Chile?: 55 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2024.
How do Bhutan and Chile rank globally for vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Bhutan ranks 52nd and Chile ranks 55th of 135 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Chile: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of-gdp/bhutan/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-unit-of-gdp/bhutan/chile/">Bhutan vs Chile: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per unit of GDP
Unit: 1000 USD per US$ of GDP
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 136 places, 7,264 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 23 September 2026

Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.