Pakistan vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Pakistan
3.02 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Saint Kitts and Nevis
2.93 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Pakistan rank
65th
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
67th

Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Pakistan
  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
0246196119922023

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 3.02 1000 USD per square kilometre against 2.93 1000 USD per square kilometre in Saint Kitts and Nevis, a difference of 0.09 1000 USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 38 shared years of data; in 1986 it was Pakistan ahead.

Pakistan ranks 65th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 67th of 135 countries.

Across the 5 decades both report, Pakistan averaged higher in 1 and Saint Kitts and Nevis in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Pakistan Saint Kitts and Nevis Difference Ahead
1980s 1.15 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.14 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0033 1000 USD per square kilometre Pakistan
1990s 1.69 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.81 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.13 1000 USD per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2000s 2.2 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.73 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.53 1000 USD per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2010s 2.34 1000 USD per square kilometre 4.57 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.22 1000 USD per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2020s 3.03 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.58 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.5567 1000 USD per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Pakistan or Saint Kitts and Nevis?
Pakistan, at 3.02 1000 USD per square kilometre against 2.93 1000 USD per square kilometre in Saint Kitts and Nevis as of 2023.
What is the difference in vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Pakistan and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
0.09 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Pakistan and Saint Kitts and Nevis?
38 years are reported by both, from 1986 to 2023.
How do Pakistan and Saint Kitts and Nevis rank globally for vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Pakistan ranks 65th and Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 67th of 135 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Pakistan vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/pakistan/st-kitts-and-nevis/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/pakistan/st-kitts-and-nevis/">Pakistan vs Saint Kitts and Nevis: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
136 places, 7,572 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.