How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Suriname?

31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Mongolia vs Suriname: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Mongolia

0.0997 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Suriname

0.1032 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Mongolia rank

130th

Suriname rank

129th

Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Mongolia
Suriname

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 0.1032 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0997 1000 USD per square kilometre in Mongolia, a difference of 0.0035 1000 USD per square kilometre.

Across all 31 years both countries report, Suriname has been ahead every year.

Mongolia ranks 130th and Suriname ranks 129th of 135 countries.

Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Mongolia	Suriname	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0088 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.1703 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.1615 1000 USD per square kilometre	Suriname
2000s	0.0186 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.136 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.1173 1000 USD per square kilometre	Suriname
2010s	0.0369 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.1771 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.1402 1000 USD per square kilometre	Suriname
2020s	0.0714 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.1189 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0475 1000 USD per square kilometre	Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Mongolia or Suriname?: Suriname, at 0.1032 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0997 1000 USD per square kilometre in Mongolia as of 2023.
What is the difference in vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Mongolia and Suriname?: 0.0035 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Suriname?: 31 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2023.
How do Mongolia and Suriname rank globally for vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Mongolia ranks 130th and Suriname ranks 129th of 135 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mongolia vs Suriname: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/mongolia/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/mongolia/suriname/">Mongolia vs Suriname: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 136 places, 7,572 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 23 September 2026

Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.