Ecuador vs Norway: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Ecuador
0.8047 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Norway
0.798 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
104th
Norway rank
105th

Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Ecuador
  • Norway
0.20.40.60.81196119922023

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 0.8047 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.798 1000 USD per square kilometre in Norway, a difference of 0.0067 1000 USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Norway ahead.

Ecuador ranks 104th and Norway ranks 105th of 135 countries.

Norway has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Norway Difference Ahead
1960s 0.5006 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.5168 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0163 1000 USD per square kilometre Norway
1970s 0.3197 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.5364 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2167 1000 USD per square kilometre Norway
1980s 0.3878 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.6049 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2172 1000 USD per square kilometre Norway
1990s 0.5064 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.5604 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0541 1000 USD per square kilometre Norway
2000s 0.6123 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.719 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1068 1000 USD per square kilometre Norway
2010s 0.7355 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.7963 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0607 1000 USD per square kilometre Norway
2020s 0.8189 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.8581 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0392 1000 USD per square kilometre Norway

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Ecuador or Norway?
Ecuador, at 0.8047 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.798 1000 USD per square kilometre in Norway as of 2023.
What is the difference in vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Ecuador and Norway?
0.0067 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Norway?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Norway rank globally for vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Ecuador ranks 104th and Norway ranks 105th of 135 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Norway: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/ecuador/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/ecuador/norway/">Ecuador vs Norway: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
136 places, 7,572 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.