Ecuador vs Finland: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Ecuador
0.8047 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Finland
0.875 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
104th
Finland rank
103rd

Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Ecuador
  • Finland
0.20.40.60.81196119922023

How they compare

Finland currently reports 0.875 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.8047 1000 USD per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 0.0703 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Finland's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 104th and Finland ranks 103rd of 135 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Finland in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Finland Difference Ahead
1960s 0.5006 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2471 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2534 1000 USD per square kilometre Ecuador
1970s 0.3197 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.389 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0693 1000 USD per square kilometre Finland
1980s 0.3878 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.6149 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2272 1000 USD per square kilometre Finland
1990s 0.5064 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.8515 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3451 1000 USD per square kilometre Finland
2000s 0.6123 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.9104 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2981 1000 USD per square kilometre Finland
2010s 0.7355 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.9486 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2131 1000 USD per square kilometre Finland
2020s 0.8189 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.9312 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1123 1000 USD per square kilometre Finland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Ecuador or Finland?
Finland, at 0.875 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.8047 1000 USD per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Ecuador and Finland?
0.0703 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Finland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Finland?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and Finland rank globally for vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Ecuador ranks 104th and Finland ranks 103rd of 135 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Finland: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/ecuador/finland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/ecuador/finland/">Ecuador vs Finland: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
136 places, 7,572 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.