How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Mongolia?

25 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2023.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chad vs Mongolia: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Chad

0.0694 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Mongolia

0.0997 1000 USD per square kilometre

in 2023

Chad rank

132nd

Mongolia rank

130th

Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Chad
Mongolia

How they compare

Mongolia currently reports 0.0997 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0694 1000 USD per square kilometre in Chad, a difference of 0.0303 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.4 times Chad's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 25 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Chad ahead.

Chad ranks 132nd and Mongolia ranks 130th of 135 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 3 and Mongolia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chad	Mongolia	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0644 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0115 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0529 1000 USD per square kilometre	Chad
2000s	0.0661 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0186 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0474 1000 USD per square kilometre	Chad
2010s	0.0711 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0369 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0342 1000 USD per square kilometre	Chad
2020s	0.0695 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0714 1000 USD per square kilometre	0.0019 1000 USD per square kilometre	Mongolia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Chad or Mongolia?: Mongolia, at 0.0997 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0694 1000 USD per square kilometre in Chad as of 2023.
What is the difference in vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Chad and Mongolia?: 0.0303 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Mongolia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Mongolia?: 25 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2023.
How do Chad and Mongolia rank globally for vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Chad ranks 132nd and Mongolia ranks 130th of 135 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Mongolia: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/chad/mongolia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/chad/mongolia/">Chad vs Mongolia: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit: 1000 USD per square kilometre
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 136 places, 7,572 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed: 23 September 2026

Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.