Canada vs Iceland: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Canada
0.1552 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland
0.1816 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Canada rank
128th
Iceland rank
127th

Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Canada
  • Iceland
00.050.10.150.2196119922023

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 0.1816 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.1552 1000 USD per square kilometre in Canada, a difference of 0.0264 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Iceland's figure about 1.2 times Canada's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Canada ahead.

Canada ranks 128th and Iceland ranks 127th of 135 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 4 and Iceland in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada Iceland Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0604 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0222 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0382 1000 USD per square kilometre Canada
1970s 0.0722 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0285 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0437 1000 USD per square kilometre Canada
1980s 0.0961 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0451 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.051 1000 USD per square kilometre Canada
1990s 0.1094 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0907 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0187 1000 USD per square kilometre Canada
2000s 0.1179 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1474 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0295 1000 USD per square kilometre Iceland
2010s 0.1446 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1816 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0371 1000 USD per square kilometre Iceland
2020s 0.1535 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1805 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0271 1000 USD per square kilometre Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Canada or Iceland?
Iceland, at 0.1816 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.1552 1000 USD per square kilometre in Canada as of 2023.
What is the difference in vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Canada and Iceland?
0.0264 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Iceland?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Canada and Iceland rank globally for vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Canada ranks 128th and Iceland ranks 127th of 135 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs Iceland: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/canada/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/canada/iceland/">Canada vs Iceland: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
136 places, 7,572 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.