Australia vs Congo: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Australia
0.248 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Congo
0.3325 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Australia rank
123rd
Congo rank
121st

Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Australia
  • Congo
0.10.20.3196119922023

How they compare

Congo currently reports 0.3325 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.248 1000 USD per square kilometre in Australia, a difference of 0.0845 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Congo's figure about 1.3 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Congo ahead.

Australia ranks 123rd and Congo ranks 121st of 135 countries.

Congo has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Congo Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0766 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0822 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0056 1000 USD per square kilometre Congo
1970s 0.0942 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1171 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0229 1000 USD per square kilometre Congo
1980s 0.1233 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.1558 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0325 1000 USD per square kilometre Congo
1990s 0.169 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2244 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0554 1000 USD per square kilometre Congo
2000s 0.2121 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2842 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0721 1000 USD per square kilometre Congo
2010s 0.224 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3196 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0956 1000 USD per square kilometre Congo
2020s 0.2502 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.3316 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0814 1000 USD per square kilometre Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Australia or Congo?
Congo, at 0.3325 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.248 1000 USD per square kilometre in Australia as of 2023.
What is the difference in vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Australia and Congo?
0.0845 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Congo?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Australia and Congo rank globally for vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Australia ranks 123rd and Congo ranks 121st of 135 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Congo: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/australia/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-square/australia/congo-rep/">Australia vs Congo: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
136 places, 7,572 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.