How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and New Caledonia?

31 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Kazakhstan vs New Caledonia: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Kazakhstan

0.0667 1000 USD per person

in 2024

New Caledonia

0.0738 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Kazakhstan rank

32nd

New Caledonia rank

29th

Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Kazakhstan
New Caledonia

How they compare

New Caledonia currently reports 0.0738 1000 USD per person against 0.0667 1000 USD per person in Kazakhstan, a difference of 0.0071 1000 USD per person.

That makes New Caledonia's figure about 1.1 times Kazakhstan's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1994 it was New Caledonia ahead.

Kazakhstan ranks 32nd and New Caledonia ranks 29th of 135 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Kazakhstan averaged higher in 1 and New Caledonia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Kazakhstan	New Caledonia	Difference	Ahead
1990s	0.0234 1000 USD per person	0.0828 1000 USD per person	0.0594 1000 USD per person	New Caledonia
2000s	0.0517 1000 USD per person	0.0974 1000 USD per person	0.0457 1000 USD per person	New Caledonia
2010s	0.0725 1000 USD per person	0.0892 1000 USD per person	0.0167 1000 USD per person	New Caledonia
2020s	0.0792 1000 USD per person	0.0717 1000 USD per person	0.0075 1000 USD per person	Kazakhstan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Kazakhstan or New Caledonia?: New Caledonia, at 0.0738 1000 USD per person against 0.0667 1000 USD per person in Kazakhstan as of 2024.
What is the difference in vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Kazakhstan and New Caledonia?: 0.0071 1000 USD per person, with New Caledonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kazakhstan and New Caledonia?: 31 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2024.
How do Kazakhstan and New Caledonia rank globally for vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Kazakhstan ranks 32nd and New Caledonia ranks 29th of 135 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Kazakhstan vs New Caledonia: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/kazakhstan/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/kazakhstan/new-caledonia/">Kazakhstan vs New Caledonia: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit: 1000 USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 136 places, 7,705 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 23 September 2026

Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.