How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Namibia?

56 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Chad vs Namibia: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Chad

0.0043 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Namibia

0.005 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Chad rank

129th

Namibia rank

127th

Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Chad
Namibia

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0.005 1000 USD per person against 0.0043 1000 USD per person in Chad, a difference of 0.0007 1000 USD per person.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.2 times Chad's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 56 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chad ahead.

Chad ranks 129th and Namibia ranks 127th of 135 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 6 and Namibia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Chad	Namibia	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0105 1000 USD per person	0.0036 1000 USD per person	0.0068 1000 USD per person	Chad
1970s	0.0093 1000 USD per person	0.0034 1000 USD per person	0.0059 1000 USD per person	Chad
1980s	0.0117 1000 USD per person	0.0033 1000 USD per person	0.0084 1000 USD per person	Chad
1990s	0.0102 1000 USD per person	0.0041 1000 USD per person	0.0061 1000 USD per person	Chad
2000s	0.0083 1000 USD per person	0.0052 1000 USD per person	0.0031 1000 USD per person	Chad
2010s	0.0063 1000 USD per person	0.0061 1000 USD per person	0.0002 1000 USD per person	Chad
2020s	0.0047 1000 USD per person	0.0052 1000 USD per person	0.0005 1000 USD per person	Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Chad or Namibia?: Namibia, at 0.005 1000 USD per person against 0.0043 1000 USD per person in Chad as of 2024.
What is the difference in vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Chad and Namibia?: 0.0007 1000 USD per person, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Namibia?: 56 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Chad and Namibia rank globally for vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Chad ranks 129th and Namibia ranks 127th of 135 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Namibia: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/chad/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/chad/namibia/">Chad vs Namibia: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit: 1000 USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 136 places, 7,705 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 23 September 2026

Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.