How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Zimbabwe?

45 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Barbados vs Zimbabwe: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Barbados

0.0857 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Zimbabwe

0.0842 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Barbados rank

22nd

Zimbabwe rank

24th

Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Barbados
Zimbabwe

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 0.0857 1000 USD per person against 0.0842 1000 USD per person in Zimbabwe, a difference of 0.0015 1000 USD per person.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Barbados ranks 22nd and Zimbabwe ranks 24th of 135 countries.

Across the 6 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 5 and Zimbabwe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Barbados	Zimbabwe	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0192 1000 USD per person	0.0229 1000 USD per person	0.0038 1000 USD per person	Zimbabwe
1970s	0.0622 1000 USD per person	0.0232 1000 USD per person	0.039 1000 USD per person	Barbados
1980s	0.0918 1000 USD per person	0.019 1000 USD per person	0.0728 1000 USD per person	Barbados
1990s	0.0757 1000 USD per person	0.0169 1000 USD per person	0.0588 1000 USD per person	Barbados
2010s	0.0869 1000 USD per person	0.056 1000 USD per person	0.0309 1000 USD per person	Barbados
2020s	0.0907 1000 USD per person	0.0818 1000 USD per person	0.0089 1000 USD per person	Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Barbados or Zimbabwe?: Barbados, at 0.0857 1000 USD per person against 0.0842 1000 USD per person in Zimbabwe as of 2024.
What is the difference in vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Barbados and Zimbabwe?: 0.0015 1000 USD per person, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Zimbabwe?: 45 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Barbados and Zimbabwe rank globally for vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Barbados ranks 22nd and Zimbabwe ranks 24th of 135 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Zimbabwe: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/barbados/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/barbados/zimbabwe/">Barbados vs Zimbabwe: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit: 1000 USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 136 places, 7,705 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 23 September 2026

Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.