How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Chile?

64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Barbados vs Chile: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Barbados

0.0857 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Chile

0.0846 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Barbados rank

22nd

Chile rank

23rd

Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

Barbados
Chile

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 0.0857 1000 USD per person against 0.0846 1000 USD per person in Chile, a difference of 0.0011 1000 USD per person.

The two have swapped places 13 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chile ahead.

Barbados ranks 22nd and Chile ranks 23rd of 135 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Barbados averaged higher in 3 and Chile in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Barbados	Chile	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0192 1000 USD per person	0.0667 1000 USD per person	0.0475 1000 USD per person	Chile
1970s	0.0622 1000 USD per person	0.0643 1000 USD per person	0.0021 1000 USD per person	Chile
1980s	0.0918 1000 USD per person	0.0778 1000 USD per person	0.014 1000 USD per person	Barbados
1990s	0.1065 1000 USD per person	0.1148 1000 USD per person	0.0082 1000 USD per person	Chile
2000s	0.1096 1000 USD per person	0.1113 1000 USD per person	0.0017 1000 USD per person	Chile
2010s	0.0869 1000 USD per person	0.0815 1000 USD per person	0.0054 1000 USD per person	Barbados
2020s	0.0907 1000 USD per person	0.0806 1000 USD per person	0.0101 1000 USD per person	Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Barbados or Chile?: Barbados, at 0.0857 1000 USD per person against 0.0846 1000 USD per person in Chile as of 2024.
What is the difference in vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Barbados and Chile?: 0.0011 1000 USD per person, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Chile?: 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Barbados and Chile rank globally for vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?: Barbados ranks 22nd and Chile ranks 23rd of 135 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Chile: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/barbados/chile/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-capita/barbados/chile/">Barbados vs Chile: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit: 1000 USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 136 places, 7,705 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 23 September 2026

Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.