Suriname vs Zambia: Vegetables Primary: Gross Production Value … square kilometre SLC

Suriname
0.4244 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
0.7112 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Suriname rank
131st
Zambia rank
129th

Vegetables Primary: Gross Production Value … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Suriname
  • Zambia
0.20.40.60.81196119922023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 0.7112 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 0.4244 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Suriname, a difference of 0.2868 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.7 times Suriname's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zambia ahead.

Suriname ranks 131st and Zambia ranks 129th of 136 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Suriname averaged higher in 2 and Zambia in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Suriname Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1633 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.2761 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.1128 1000 SLC per square kilometre Zambia
1970s 0.1327 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.3848 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.2521 1000 SLC per square kilometre Zambia
1980s 0.2719 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.5013 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.2293 1000 SLC per square kilometre Zambia
1990s 0.7209 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.5874 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.1335 1000 SLC per square kilometre Suriname
2000s 0.5412 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.542 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.0008 1000 SLC per square kilometre Zambia
2010s 0.7294 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.6757 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.0537 1000 SLC per square kilometre Suriname
2020s 0.489 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.7066 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.2176 1000 SLC per square kilometre Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Suriname or Zambia?
Zambia, at 0.7112 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 0.4244 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Suriname as of 2023.
What is the difference in vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Suriname and Zambia?
0.2868 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Suriname and Zambia?
49 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Suriname and Zambia rank globally for vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Suriname ranks 131st and Zambia ranks 129th of 136 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Suriname vs Zambia: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square/suriname/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square/suriname/zambia/">Suriname vs Zambia: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
136 places, 7,598 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.