Myanmar vs Rwanda: Vegetables Primary: Gross Production Value … square kilometre SLC

Myanmar
4,404 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
7,649 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Myanmar rank
7th
Rwanda rank
5th

Vegetables Primary: Gross Production Value … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Myanmar
  • Rwanda
02.0k4.0k6.0k8.0k196119922023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 7,649 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 4,404 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Myanmar, a difference of 3,245 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.7 times Myanmar's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Rwanda ahead.

Myanmar ranks 7th and Rwanda ranks 5th of 136 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Myanmar averaged higher in 2 and Rwanda in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Myanmar Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 550.48 1000 SLC per square kilometre 676.41 1000 SLC per square kilometre 125.93 1000 SLC per square kilometre Rwanda
1970s 849.5 1000 SLC per square kilometre 875.47 1000 SLC per square kilometre 25.97 1000 SLC per square kilometre Rwanda
1980s 1,448 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1,059 1000 SLC per square kilometre 388.95 1000 SLC per square kilometre Myanmar
1990s 2,026 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1,220 1000 SLC per square kilometre 806.95 1000 SLC per square kilometre Myanmar
2000s 3,510 1000 SLC per square kilometre 3,918 1000 SLC per square kilometre 407.14 1000 SLC per square kilometre Rwanda
2010s 4,320 1000 SLC per square kilometre 6,856 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2,536 1000 SLC per square kilometre Rwanda
2020s 4,409 1000 SLC per square kilometre 7,744 1000 SLC per square kilometre 3,335 1000 SLC per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Myanmar or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 7,649 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 4,404 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Myanmar as of 2023.
What is the difference in vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Myanmar and Rwanda?
3,245 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Myanmar and Rwanda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Myanmar and Rwanda rank globally for vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Myanmar ranks 7th and Rwanda ranks 5th of 136 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Myanmar vs Rwanda: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square/myanmar/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square/myanmar/rwanda/">Myanmar vs Rwanda: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
136 places, 7,598 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.