Malta vs Seychelles: Vegetables Primary: Gross Production Value … square kilometre SLC

Malta
46.91 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Seychelles
44.53 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Malta rank
57th
Seychelles rank
59th

Vegetables Primary: Gross Production Value … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Malta
  • Seychelles
050100150196119922023

How they compare

Malta currently reports 46.91 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 44.53 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Seychelles, a difference of 2.38 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Malta's figure about 1.1 times Seychelles's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Malta ahead.

Malta ranks 57th and Seychelles ranks 59th of 136 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta Seychelles Difference Ahead
1960s 55.48 1000 SLC per square kilometre 9.63 1000 SLC per square kilometre 45.85 1000 SLC per square kilometre Malta
1970s 75.55 1000 SLC per square kilometre 12.22 1000 SLC per square kilometre 63.33 1000 SLC per square kilometre Malta
1980s 87.02 1000 SLC per square kilometre 15.74 1000 SLC per square kilometre 71.28 1000 SLC per square kilometre Malta
1990s 104.88 1000 SLC per square kilometre 17.45 1000 SLC per square kilometre 87.43 1000 SLC per square kilometre Malta
2000s 111.46 1000 SLC per square kilometre 27.23 1000 SLC per square kilometre 84.23 1000 SLC per square kilometre Malta
2010s 99.87 1000 SLC per square kilometre 41.55 1000 SLC per square kilometre 58.32 1000 SLC per square kilometre Malta
2020s 47.92 1000 SLC per square kilometre 44.53 1000 SLC per square kilometre 3.39 1000 SLC per square kilometre Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Malta or Seychelles?
Malta, at 46.91 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 44.53 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Seychelles as of 2023.
What is the difference in vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Malta and Seychelles?
2.38 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Seychelles?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Malta and Seychelles rank globally for vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Malta ranks 57th and Seychelles ranks 59th of 136 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Seychelles: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square/malta/seychelles/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square/malta/seychelles/">Malta vs Seychelles: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
136 places, 7,598 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.