Egypt vs Morocco: Vegetables Primary: Gross Production Value … square kilometre SLC

Egypt
26.05 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Morocco
30.03 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Egypt rank
71st
Morocco rank
69th

Vegetables Primary: Gross Production Value … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Egypt
  • Morocco
0102030196119922023

How they compare

Morocco currently reports 30.03 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 26.05 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Egypt, a difference of 3.98 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Morocco's figure about 1.2 times Egypt's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Egypt ahead.

Egypt ranks 71st and Morocco ranks 69th of 136 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 3 and Morocco in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt Morocco Difference Ahead
1960s 4.69 1000 SLC per square kilometre 4.17 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.5199 1000 SLC per square kilometre Egypt
1970s 6.55 1000 SLC per square kilometre 5.81 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.7394 1000 SLC per square kilometre Egypt
1980s 9.81 1000 SLC per square kilometre 8.74 1000 SLC per square kilometre 1.07 1000 SLC per square kilometre Egypt
1990s 13.16 1000 SLC per square kilometre 15.34 1000 SLC per square kilometre 2.18 1000 SLC per square kilometre Morocco
2000s 21.23 1000 SLC per square kilometre 24.32 1000 SLC per square kilometre 3.09 1000 SLC per square kilometre Morocco
2010s 22.65 1000 SLC per square kilometre 29.21 1000 SLC per square kilometre 6.55 1000 SLC per square kilometre Morocco
2020s 23.48 1000 SLC per square kilometre 28.91 1000 SLC per square kilometre 5.43 1000 SLC per square kilometre Morocco

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Egypt or Morocco?
Morocco, at 30.03 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 26.05 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Egypt as of 2023.
What is the difference in vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Egypt and Morocco?
3.98 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Morocco ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Morocco?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Egypt and Morocco rank globally for vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Egypt ranks 71st and Morocco ranks 69th of 136 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Egypt vs Morocco: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square/egypt-arab-rep/morocco/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square/egypt-arab-rep/morocco/">Egypt vs Morocco: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
136 places, 7,598 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.