Canada vs Namibia: Vegetables Primary: Gross Production Value … square kilometre SLC

Canada
0.1915 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
0.229 1000 SLC per square kilometre
in 2023
Canada rank
135th
Namibia rank
134th

Vegetables Primary: Gross Production Value … square kilometre SLC over time

  • Canada
  • Namibia
0.050.10.150.20.25196119922023

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0.229 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 0.1915 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Canada, a difference of 0.0375 1000 SLC per square kilometre.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.2 times Canada's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Canada ahead.

Canada ranks 135th and Namibia ranks 134th of 136 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Canada averaged higher in 4 and Namibia in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada Namibia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0745 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.0367 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.0377 1000 SLC per square kilometre Canada
1970s 0.0891 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.0444 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.0447 1000 SLC per square kilometre Canada
1980s 0.1185 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.0552 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.0632 1000 SLC per square kilometre Canada
1990s 0.1349 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.0926 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.0423 1000 SLC per square kilometre Canada
2000s 0.1454 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.1542 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.0088 1000 SLC per square kilometre Namibia
2010s 0.1783 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.2163 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.038 1000 SLC per square kilometre Namibia
2020s 0.1893 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.229 1000 SLC per square kilometre 0.0397 1000 SLC per square kilometre Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Canada or Namibia?
Namibia, at 0.229 1000 SLC per square kilometre against 0.1915 1000 SLC per square kilometre in Canada as of 2023.
What is the difference in vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Canada and Namibia?
0.0375 1000 SLC per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Namibia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Canada and Namibia rank globally for vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Canada ranks 135th and Namibia ranks 134th of 136 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs Namibia: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square/canada/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-slc-per-square/canada/namibia/">Canada vs Namibia: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 SLC per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
136 places, 7,598 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand SLC) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.