Rwanda vs Singapore: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Rwanda
8.74 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Singapore
8.77 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda rank
26th
Singapore rank
25th

Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Rwanda
  • Singapore
0102030196119922023

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 8.77 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 8.74 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 0.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.

Rwanda ranks 26th and Singapore ranks 25th of 169 countries.

Singapore has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Rwanda Singapore Difference Ahead
1960s 1.3 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 17.4 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 16.11 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Singapore
1970s 1.68 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 21.36 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 19.68 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Singapore
1980s 1.73 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 12.31 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 10.58 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Singapore
1990s 1.72 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.34 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.62 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Singapore
2000s 4.75 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 7.57 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.81 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Singapore
2010s 8.19 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 10.86 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 2.68 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Singapore
2020s 8.81 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 10.32 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.51 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Rwanda or Singapore?
Singapore, at 8.77 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 8.74 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Rwanda and Singapore?
0.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Rwanda and Singapore?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Rwanda and Singapore rank globally for vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Rwanda ranks 26th and Singapore ranks 25th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Rwanda vs Singapore: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/rwanda/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/rwanda/singapore/">Rwanda vs Singapore: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,666 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.