Libya vs Zambia: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Libya
0.1689 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
0.1857 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Libya rank
149th
Zambia rank
147th

Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Libya
  • Zambia
00.050.10.150.2196119922023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 0.1857 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.1689 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Libya, a difference of 0.0168 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.1 times Libya's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 49 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Zambia ahead.

Libya ranks 149th and Zambia ranks 147th of 169 countries.

Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Libya Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0254 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0566 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0312 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zambia
1970s 0.0705 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0772 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0068 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zambia
1980s 0.1025 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.105 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0025 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zambia
1990s 0.1148 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1207 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0059 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zambia
2000s 0.1495 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.152 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0025 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zambia
2010s 0.1634 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1813 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0179 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zambia
2020s 0.1677 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.185 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0174 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Libya or Zambia?
Zambia, at 0.1857 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.1689 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Libya as of 2023.
What is the difference in vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Libya and Zambia?
0.0168 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Zambia?
49 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Libya and Zambia rank globally for vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Libya ranks 149th and Zambia ranks 147th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Libya vs Zambia: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/libya/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/libya/zambia/">Libya vs Zambia: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,666 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.