Jordan vs Tuvalu: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Jordan
7.57 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Tuvalu
6.17 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Jordan rank
35th
Tuvalu rank
37th

Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Jordan
  • Tuvalu
0246810196119922023

How they compare

Jordan currently reports 7.57 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 6.17 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Tuvalu, a difference of 1.4 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Jordan's figure about 1.2 times Tuvalu's.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Jordan ahead.

Jordan ranks 35th and Tuvalu ranks 37th of 169 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Jordan averaged higher in 4 and Tuvalu in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jordan Tuvalu Difference Ahead
1960s 1.78 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.7 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.082 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jordan
1970s 1.19 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.97 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7844 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tuvalu
1980s 2.3 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.19 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8893 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tuvalu
1990s 3.33 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.55 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.222 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Tuvalu
2000s 5.29 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 5.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2763 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jordan
2010s 7.64 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 5.83 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.81 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jordan
2020s 7.2 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 6.17 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.02 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Jordan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Jordan or Tuvalu?
Jordan, at 7.57 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 6.17 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Tuvalu as of 2023.
What is the difference in vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Jordan and Tuvalu?
1.4 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Jordan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Tuvalu?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Jordan and Tuvalu rank globally for vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Jordan ranks 35th and Tuvalu ranks 37th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Jordan vs Tuvalu: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/jordan/tuvalu/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/jordan/tuvalu/">Jordan vs Tuvalu: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,666 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.