Iceland vs Suriname: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Iceland
0.0257 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Suriname
0.0245 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland rank
167th
Suriname rank
168th

Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Iceland
  • Suriname
00.020.040.06196119922023

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 0.0257 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0245 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Suriname, a difference of 0.0012 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Suriname ahead.

Iceland ranks 167th and Suriname ranks 168th of 169 countries.

Suriname has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Suriname Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0031 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0092 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0061 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Suriname
1970s 0.0039 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0073 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0034 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Suriname
1980s 0.0061 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.017 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.011 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Suriname
1990s 0.0124 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0485 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0361 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Suriname
2000s 0.0206 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0331 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0125 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Suriname
2010s 0.0252 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0406 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0154 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Suriname
2020s 0.0255 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0279 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0024 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Iceland or Suriname?
Iceland, at 0.0257 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0245 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Suriname as of 2023.
What is the difference in vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Iceland and Suriname?
0.0012 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Suriname?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Iceland and Suriname rank globally for vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Iceland ranks 167th and Suriname ranks 168th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Suriname: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/iceland/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/iceland/suriname/">Iceland vs Suriname: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,666 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.