Iceland vs Namibia: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Iceland
0.0257 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia
0.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland rank
167th
Namibia rank
165th

Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Iceland
  • Namibia
00.010.020.03196119922023

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0257 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Iceland, a difference of 0.0043 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.2 times Iceland's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Iceland ahead.

Iceland ranks 167th and Namibia ranks 165th of 169 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 5 and Namibia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Namibia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0031 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0015 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0016 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iceland
1970s 0.0039 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0018 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0021 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iceland
1980s 0.0061 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0023 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0038 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iceland
1990s 0.0124 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0044 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.008 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iceland
2000s 0.0206 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0151 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0055 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Iceland
2010s 0.0252 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0277 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0025 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Namibia
2020s 0.0255 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0045 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Iceland or Namibia?
Namibia, at 0.03 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0257 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Iceland as of 2023.
What is the difference in vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Iceland and Namibia?
0.0043 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Namibia?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Iceland and Namibia rank globally for vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Iceland ranks 167th and Namibia ranks 165th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Namibia: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/iceland/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/iceland/namibia/">Iceland vs Namibia: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,666 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.