Eswatini vs Sweden: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Eswatini
0.2856 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Sweden
0.2956 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
142nd
Sweden rank
139th

Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Eswatini
  • Sweden
00.10.20.30.4196119922023

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 0.2956 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.2856 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 0.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 10 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sweden ahead.

Eswatini ranks 142nd and Sweden ranks 139th of 169 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 2 and Sweden in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Sweden Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1607 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.203 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0424 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Sweden
1970s 0.2209 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2014 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0195 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1980s 0.2607 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2345 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0262 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 0.2328 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2434 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0105 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Sweden
2000s 0.2295 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2824 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0529 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Sweden
2010s 0.2777 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3109 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0332 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Sweden
2020s 0.2825 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3068 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0243 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Eswatini or Sweden?
Sweden, at 0.2956 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.2856 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Eswatini and Sweden?
0.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Sweden?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Sweden rank globally for vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Eswatini ranks 142nd and Sweden ranks 139th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Sweden: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/eswatini/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/eswatini/sweden/">Eswatini vs Sweden: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,666 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.