Eswatini vs Finland: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Eswatini
0.2856 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Finland
0.2917 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
142nd
Finland rank
140th

Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Eswatini
  • Finland
0.10.20.3196119922023

How they compare

Finland currently reports 0.2917 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.2856 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Eswatini, a difference of 0.0061 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Eswatini ahead.

Eswatini ranks 142nd and Finland ranks 140th of 169 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 3 and Finland in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Finland Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1607 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0779 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0827 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1970s 0.2209 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1149 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1059 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1980s 0.2607 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1865 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0742 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 0.2328 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2665 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0337 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Finland
2000s 0.2295 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2848 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0553 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Finland
2010s 0.2777 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3048 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0271 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Finland
2020s 0.2825 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3062 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0237 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Finland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Eswatini or Finland?
Finland, at 0.2917 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.2856 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Eswatini as of 2023.
What is the difference in vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Eswatini and Finland?
0.0061 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Finland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Finland?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and Finland rank globally for vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Eswatini ranks 142nd and Finland ranks 140th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Finland: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/eswatini/finland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/eswatini/finland/">Eswatini vs Finland: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,666 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.