Chile vs Costa Rica: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Chile
1.37 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica
1.49 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
93rd
Costa Rica rank
90th

Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Chile
  • Costa Rica
00.511.5196119922023

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 1.49 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.37 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Chile, a difference of 0.12 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Costa Rica's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 93rd and Costa Rica ranks 90th of 169 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 5 and Costa Rica in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Costa Rica Difference Ahead
1960s 0.4629 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2292 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2337 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
1970s 0.523 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3318 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1912 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
1980s 0.7674 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.4714 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.296 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
1990s 1.38 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.6261 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.7543 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
2000s 1.5 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.24 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2599 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chile
2010s 1.25 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.42 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1689 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Costa Rica
2020s 1.3 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.44 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1323 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Chile or Costa Rica?
Costa Rica, at 1.49 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 1.37 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Chile as of 2023.
What is the difference in vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Chile and Costa Rica?
0.12 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Costa Rica?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Costa Rica rank globally for vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Chile ranks 93rd and Costa Rica ranks 90th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Costa Rica: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/chile/costa-rica/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/chile/costa-rica/">Chile vs Costa Rica: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,666 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.