Chad vs Mongolia: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Chad
0.0265 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Mongolia
0.0396 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chad rank
166th
Mongolia rank
163rd

Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Chad
  • Mongolia
00.010.020.030.04196119922023

How they compare

Mongolia currently reports 0.0396 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0265 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Chad, a difference of 0.0131 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.5 times Chad's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 55 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chad ahead.

Chad ranks 166th and Mongolia ranks 163rd of 169 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chad averaged higher in 6 and Mongolia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chad Mongolia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0108 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0022 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0086 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chad
1970s 0.0117 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0037 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.008 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chad
1980s 0.0179 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0079 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.01 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chad
1990s 0.0215 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0075 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.014 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chad
2000s 0.0247 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.011 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0137 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chad
2010s 0.0269 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0156 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0114 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chad
2020s 0.0265 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0288 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0023 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Mongolia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Chad or Mongolia?
Mongolia, at 0.0396 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0265 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Chad as of 2023.
What is the difference in vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Chad and Mongolia?
0.0131 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Mongolia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chad and Mongolia?
55 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chad and Mongolia rank globally for vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Chad ranks 166th and Mongolia ranks 163rd of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chad vs Mongolia: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/chad/mongolia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/chad/mongolia/">Chad vs Mongolia: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,666 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.