Botswana vs Chad: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Botswana
0.0366 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Chad
0.0265 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Botswana rank
164th
Chad rank
166th

Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Botswana
  • Chad
00.010.020.030.040.05196119922023

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 0.0366 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0265 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Chad, a difference of 0.0101 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes Botswana's figure about 1.4 times Chad's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 55 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chad ahead.

Botswana ranks 164th and Chad ranks 166th of 169 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 2 and Chad in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Chad Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0054 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0108 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0054 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chad
1970s 0.0075 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0117 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0042 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chad
1980s 0.0086 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0179 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0093 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chad
1990s 0.0089 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0215 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0126 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chad
2000s 0.0126 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0247 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0121 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Chad
2010s 0.0312 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0269 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0043 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Botswana
2020s 0.0378 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0265 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0113 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Botswana or Chad?
Botswana, at 0.0366 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.0265 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Chad as of 2023.
What is the difference in vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Botswana and Chad?
0.0101 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Chad?
55 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Botswana and Chad rank globally for vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Botswana ranks 164th and Chad ranks 166th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Chad: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 06 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/botswana/chad/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/botswana/chad/">Botswana vs Chad: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,666 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.