Bhutan vs Eswatini: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Bhutan
0.274 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini
0.2856 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bhutan rank
143rd
Eswatini rank
142nd

Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Bhutan
  • Eswatini
00.20.40.6196119922023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 0.2856 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.274 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Bhutan, a difference of 0.0116 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Eswatini ahead.

Bhutan ranks 143rd and Eswatini ranks 142nd of 169 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Bhutan averaged higher in 3 and Eswatini in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bhutan Eswatini Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0534 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1607 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1073 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1970s 0.0595 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2209 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1614 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1980s 0.0991 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2607 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1616 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
1990s 0.1608 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2328 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0721 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Eswatini
2000s 0.3488 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2295 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1193 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bhutan
2010s 0.4745 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2777 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.1968 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bhutan
2020s 0.3621 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.2825 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.0796 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bhutan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Bhutan or Eswatini?
Eswatini, at 0.2856 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 0.274 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Bhutan as of 2023.
What is the difference in vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Bhutan and Eswatini?
0.0116 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bhutan and Eswatini?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bhutan and Eswatini rank globally for vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Bhutan ranks 143rd and Eswatini ranks 142nd of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bhutan vs Eswatini: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/bhutan/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/bhutan/eswatini/">Bhutan vs Eswatini: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,666 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.