Bangladesh vs China: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Bangladesh
23.98 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
China
28.12 1000 Int$ per square kilometre
in 2023
Bangladesh rank
6th
China rank
4th

Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Bangladesh
  • China
0102030196119922023

How they compare

China currently reports 28.12 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 23.98 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Bangladesh, a difference of 4.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre.

That makes China's figure about 1.2 times Bangladesh's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Bangladesh ahead.

Bangladesh ranks 6th and China ranks 4th of 169 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Bangladesh averaged higher in 2 and China in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Bangladesh China Difference Ahead
1960s 2.61 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.82 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.79 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bangladesh
1970s 2.66 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 1.8 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.8652 1000 Int$ per square kilometre Bangladesh
1980s 2.86 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.19 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 0.3387 1000 Int$ per square kilometre China
1990s 3.66 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 6.88 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 3.22 1000 Int$ per square kilometre China
2000s 6.6 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 16.04 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 9.44 1000 Int$ per square kilometre China
2010s 14.95 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 24.4 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 9.45 1000 Int$ per square kilometre China
2020s 22.2 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 27.65 1000 Int$ per square kilometre 5.44 1000 Int$ per square kilometre China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Bangladesh or China?
China, at 28.12 1000 Int$ per square kilometre against 23.98 1000 Int$ per square kilometre in Bangladesh as of 2023.
What is the difference in vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Bangladesh and China?
4.14 1000 Int$ per square kilometre, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Bangladesh and China?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Bangladesh and China rank globally for vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Bangladesh ranks 6th and China ranks 4th of 169 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Bangladesh vs China: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 05 October 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/bangladesh/china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-per-square/bangladesh/china/">Bangladesh vs China: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 Int$ per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
170 places, 9,666 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.