Eswatini vs Guatemala: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)

Eswatini
0.3664 % change on previous year
in 2024
Guatemala
0.4189 % change on previous year
in 2024
Eswatini rank
107th
Guatemala rank
106th

Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016) over time

  • Eswatini
  • Guatemala
-100102030196219932024

How they compare

Guatemala currently reports 0.4189 % change on previous year against 0.3664 % change on previous year in Eswatini, a difference of 0.0525 % change on previous year.

That makes Guatemala's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 32 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Guatemala ahead.

Eswatini ranks 107th and Guatemala ranks 106th of 210 countries.

Guatemala has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini Guatemala Difference Ahead
1960s 4.8 % change on previous year 6.08 % change on previous year 1.28 % change on previous year Guatemala
1970s 2.37 % change on previous year 2.97 % change on previous year 0.5988 % change on previous year Guatemala
1980s 0.8953 % change on previous year 6.15 % change on previous year 5.25 % change on previous year Guatemala
1990s -1.66 % change on previous year 4.56 % change on previous year 6.21 % change on previous year Guatemala
2000s 1.09 % change on previous year 5.77 % change on previous year 4.68 % change on previous year Guatemala
2010s 1.07 % change on previous year 2.95 % change on previous year 1.88 % change on previous year Guatemala
2020s 0.6677 % change on previous year 1.23 % change on previous year 0.5601 % change on previous year Guatemala

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016), Eswatini or Guatemala?
Guatemala, at 0.4189 % change on previous year against 0.3664 % change on previous year in Eswatini as of 2024.
What is the difference in vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016) between Eswatini and Guatemala?
0.0525 % change on previous year, with Guatemala ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Guatemala?
63 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2024.
How do Eswatini and Guatemala rank globally for vegetables primary — gross production value (constant 2014-2016)?
Eswatini ranks 107th and Guatemala ranks 106th of 210 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs Guatemala: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 25 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-annual-growth-rate/eswatini/guatemala/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-i-annual-growth-rate/eswatini/guatemala/">Eswatini vs Guatemala: Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$), annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
240 places, 13,604 data points, 1962–2024
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Vegetables Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand I$). Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.