Eritrea vs Rwanda: Vegetables Primary — Area harvested, per unit of GDP
Eritrea
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2011
Rwanda
0 ha per US$ of GDP
in 2024
Eritrea rank
14th
Rwanda rank
12th
Vegetables Primary — Area harvested, per unit of GDP over time
- Eritrea
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Eritrea, a difference of 0 ha per US$ of GDP.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Eritrea's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 19 shared years of data; in 1993 it was Eritrea ahead.
Eritrea ranks 14th and Rwanda ranks 12th of 168 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Eritrea averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eritrea | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Eritrea |
| 2000s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | 0 ha per US$ of GDP | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher vegetables primary — area harvested, per unit of gdp, Eritrea or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 0 ha per US$ of GDP against 0 ha per US$ of GDP in Eritrea as of 2024.
- What is the difference in vegetables primary — area harvested, per unit of gdp between Eritrea and Rwanda?
- 0 ha per US$ of GDP, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eritrea and Rwanda?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2011.
- How do Eritrea and Rwanda rank globally for vegetables primary — area harvested, per unit of gdp?
- Eritrea ranks 14th and Rwanda ranks 12th of 168 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Vegetables Primary — Area harvested, per unit of GDP. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Vegetables Primary — Area harvested divided by GDP (current US$), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.