Equatorial Guinea vs Namibia: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant)

Equatorial Guinea
0.0169 1000 USD per person
in 2024
Namibia
0.0202 1000 USD per person
in 2024
Equatorial Guinea rank
127th
Namibia rank
124th

Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant) over time

  • Equatorial Guinea
  • Namibia
0.010.020.030.04196119922024

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 0.0202 1000 USD per person against 0.0169 1000 USD per person in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.0033 1000 USD per person.

That makes Namibia's figure about 1.2 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Equatorial Guinea ranks 127th and Namibia ranks 124th of 140 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Equatorial Guinea averaged higher in 6 and Namibia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Equatorial Guinea Namibia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0211 1000 USD per person 0.0072 1000 USD per person 0.0139 1000 USD per person Equatorial Guinea
1970s 0.0192 1000 USD per person 0.0069 1000 USD per person 0.0123 1000 USD per person Equatorial Guinea
1980s 0.0184 1000 USD per person 0.0069 1000 USD per person 0.0116 1000 USD per person Equatorial Guinea
1990s 0.0343 1000 USD per person 0.0074 1000 USD per person 0.0269 1000 USD per person Equatorial Guinea
2000s 0.0275 1000 USD per person 0.0148 1000 USD per person 0.0127 1000 USD per person Equatorial Guinea
2010s 0.0211 1000 USD per person 0.02 1000 USD per person 0.0011 1000 USD per person Equatorial Guinea
2020s 0.0177 1000 USD per person 0.0206 1000 USD per person 0.0029 1000 USD per person Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant), Equatorial Guinea or Namibia?
Namibia, at 0.0202 1000 USD per person against 0.0169 1000 USD per person in Equatorial Guinea as of 2024.
What is the difference in vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant) between Equatorial Guinea and Namibia?
0.0033 1000 USD per person, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Namibia?
64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Equatorial Guinea and Namibia rank globally for vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant)?
Equatorial Guinea ranks 127th and Namibia ranks 124th of 140 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Equatorial Guinea vs Namibia: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-and-fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per/equatorial-guinea/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-and-fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per/equatorial-guinea/namibia/">Equatorial Guinea vs Namibia: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit
1000 USD per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
141 places, 7,967 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed

Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.