How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Rwanda?

64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Ecuador vs Rwanda: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant)

Ecuador

0.1446 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Rwanda

0.138 1000 USD per person

in 2024

Ecuador rank

34th

Rwanda rank

36th

Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant) over time

Ecuador
Rwanda

How they compare

Ecuador currently reports 0.1446 1000 USD per person against 0.138 1000 USD per person in Rwanda, a difference of 0.0066 1000 USD per person.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Rwanda ahead.

Ecuador ranks 34th and Rwanda ranks 36th of 140 countries.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Ecuador	Rwanda	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.1991 1000 USD per person	0.2602 1000 USD per person	0.0611 1000 USD per person	Rwanda
1970s	0.1446 1000 USD per person	0.275 1000 USD per person	0.1303 1000 USD per person	Rwanda
1980s	0.1102 1000 USD per person	0.2665 1000 USD per person	0.1563 1000 USD per person	Rwanda
1990s	0.1414 1000 USD per person	0.2382 1000 USD per person	0.0968 1000 USD per person	Rwanda
2000s	0.1467 1000 USD per person	0.2091 1000 USD per person	0.0624 1000 USD per person	Rwanda
2010s	0.1375 1000 USD per person	0.1586 1000 USD per person	0.0211 1000 USD per person	Rwanda
2020s	0.1312 1000 USD per person	0.1335 1000 USD per person	0.0023 1000 USD per person	Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant), Ecuador or Rwanda?: Ecuador, at 0.1446 1000 USD per person against 0.138 1000 USD per person in Rwanda as of 2024.
What is the difference in vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant) between Ecuador and Rwanda?: 0.0066 1000 USD per person, with Ecuador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Rwanda?: 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
How do Ecuador and Rwanda rank globally for vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant)?: Ecuador ranks 34th and Rwanda ranks 36th of 140 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Rwanda: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-and-fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per/ecuador/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-and-fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per/ecuador/rwanda/">Ecuador vs Rwanda: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per capita
Unit: 1000 USD per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 141 places, 7,967 data points, 1961–2024
Last refreshed: 23 September 2026

Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.