Namibia vs Zambia: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant)

Namibia
0.0729 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Zambia
0.0941 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Namibia rank
138th
Zambia rank
137th

Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant) over time

  • Namibia
  • Zambia
00.020.040.060.080.1196119922023

How they compare

Zambia currently reports 0.0941 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0729 1000 USD per square kilometre in Namibia, a difference of 0.0212 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes Zambia's figure about 1.3 times Namibia's.

Across all 49 years both countries report, Zambia has been ahead every year.

Namibia ranks 138th and Zambia ranks 137th of 140 countries.

Zambia has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia Zambia Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0058 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0375 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0317 1000 USD per square kilometre Zambia
1970s 0.0072 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0524 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0451 1000 USD per square kilometre Zambia
1980s 0.0092 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0672 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.058 1000 USD per square kilometre Zambia
1990s 0.0112 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0786 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0674 1000 USD per square kilometre Zambia
2000s 0.044 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0722 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0282 1000 USD per square kilometre Zambia
2010s 0.0573 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0897 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0324 1000 USD per square kilometre Zambia
2020s 0.0717 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0936 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.0219 1000 USD per square kilometre Zambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant), Namibia or Zambia?
Zambia, at 0.0941 1000 USD per square kilometre against 0.0729 1000 USD per square kilometre in Namibia as of 2023.
What is the difference in vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant) between Namibia and Zambia?
0.0212 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Zambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Zambia?
49 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Namibia and Zambia rank globally for vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant)?
Namibia ranks 138th and Zambia ranks 137th of 140 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs Zambia: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-and-fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-3/namibia/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-and-fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-3/namibia/zambia/">Namibia vs Zambia: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
141 places, 7,828 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.