Iraq vs New Caledonia: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant)

Iraq
2.84 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
New Caledonia
2.78 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Iraq rank
96th
New Caledonia rank
98th

Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant) over time

  • Iraq
  • New Caledonia
0246196119922023

How they compare

Iraq currently reports 2.84 1000 USD per square kilometre against 2.78 1000 USD per square kilometre in New Caledonia, a difference of 0.06 1000 USD per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 51 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Iraq ahead.

Iraq ranks 96th and New Caledonia ranks 98th of 140 countries.

Iraq has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iraq New Caledonia Difference Ahead
1960s 1.85 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.864 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.9829 1000 USD per square kilometre Iraq
1970s 2.96 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.7329 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.23 1000 USD per square kilometre Iraq
1980s 5.1 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.74 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.36 1000 USD per square kilometre Iraq
1990s 6.06 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.9501 1000 USD per square kilometre 5.11 1000 USD per square kilometre Iraq
2000s 5.84 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.75 1000 USD per square kilometre 4.09 1000 USD per square kilometre Iraq
2010s 4.49 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.5 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.99 1000 USD per square kilometre Iraq
2020s 4.24 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.8 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.43 1000 USD per square kilometre Iraq

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant), Iraq or New Caledonia?
Iraq, at 2.84 1000 USD per square kilometre against 2.78 1000 USD per square kilometre in New Caledonia as of 2023.
What is the difference in vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant) between Iraq and New Caledonia?
0.06 1000 USD per square kilometre, with Iraq ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and New Caledonia?
51 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Iraq and New Caledonia rank globally for vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant)?
Iraq ranks 96th and New Caledonia ranks 98th of 140 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iraq vs New Caledonia: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-and-fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-3/iraq/new-caledonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-and-fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-3/iraq/new-caledonia/">Iraq vs New Caledonia: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
141 places, 7,828 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.