Ecuador vs New Zealand: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant)

Ecuador
10.11 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
New Zealand
10.7 1000 USD per square kilometre
in 2023
Ecuador rank
57th
New Zealand rank
54th

Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant) over time

  • Ecuador
  • New Zealand
246810196119922023

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 10.7 1000 USD per square kilometre against 10.11 1000 USD per square kilometre in Ecuador, a difference of 0.59 1000 USD per square kilometre.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.

Ecuador ranks 57th and New Zealand ranks 54th of 140 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 6 and New Zealand in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador New Zealand Difference Ahead
1960s 3.81 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.38 1000 USD per square kilometre 2.43 1000 USD per square kilometre Ecuador
1970s 3.65 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.73 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.93 1000 USD per square kilometre Ecuador
1980s 3.65 1000 USD per square kilometre 3.27 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.377 1000 USD per square kilometre Ecuador
1990s 6.06 1000 USD per square kilometre 5.39 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.6717 1000 USD per square kilometre Ecuador
2000s 8.12 1000 USD per square kilometre 6.85 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.28 1000 USD per square kilometre Ecuador
2010s 8.93 1000 USD per square kilometre 8.7 1000 USD per square kilometre 0.2295 1000 USD per square kilometre Ecuador
2020s 9.14 1000 USD per square kilometre 10.45 1000 USD per square kilometre 1.31 1000 USD per square kilometre New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant), Ecuador or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 10.7 1000 USD per square kilometre against 10.11 1000 USD per square kilometre in Ecuador as of 2023.
What is the difference in vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant) between Ecuador and New Zealand?
0.59 1000 USD per square kilometre, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and New Zealand?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Ecuador and New Zealand rank globally for vegetables and fruit primary — gross production value (constant)?
Ecuador ranks 57th and New Zealand ranks 54th of 140 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs New Zealand: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 23 September 2026, from https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-and-fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-3/ecuador/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://agriculture.statizoid.com/compare/vegetables-and-fruit-primary-gross-production-value-constant-2014-2016-thousand-us-per-3/ecuador/new-zealand/">Ecuador vs New Zealand: Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$), per square kilometre
Unit
1000 USD per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
141 places, 7,828 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Vegetables and Fruit Primary — Gross Production Value (constant 2014-2016 thousand US$) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.